ARB Review

[Jono Bacon]

On 11 April 2012 08:12, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
<jonathan at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> It /has/ to adhere to the criteria listed on
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Review/Guidelines
>
> If it doesn't, I won't +1 it. It *has* to be released under a free license,
> it *has* to comply with the Ubuntu CoC, it *can't* touch any system files.
> Other packaging related problems we can typically work around, but the
> subset of guidelines you're suggesting is completely insufficient. If you
> don't understand it, then I'm sure we can set up some time to explain it to
> you.

I think it could be useful to re-review that page. While most of the
content I think looks good, it could be a good discussion at UDS to
review if the topics on that page still make sense. Two examples that
spring to mind include requires installation to /opt and whether the
ARB could also review documentation and media bundles.

   Jono

-- 
Jono Bacon
Ubuntu Community Manager
www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org
www.identi.ca/jonobacon www.twitter.com/jonobacon