On 12/4/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Lukas Sabota</b> <<a href="mailto:punkrockguy318@comcast.net">punkrockguy318@comcast.net</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
An optimal rendering of underscored filenames would be like so:<br><br>My_Work_<br>Summary_Report_<br>of_June_2005.odt<br><br>What do you think of this idea? Are there any drawbacks to this<br>potential patch?<br></blockquote>
</div><br>
Seems fine to me. How about other cases, such as double underscores?
Also, there are other special characters that could be treated as
potential line breaking points (exclamation points, hyphens, periods,
dashes...) as long as they are surrounded by alphanumerical symbols. In
fact, coming up with an actual set of rules for the general case is
harder than it seems.<br>
<br>
My suggestion -- please come up with more test cases, just to be sure
that it does not produce weird results. There are really weird stuff in
P2P networks that could be use to test it.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Carlos Ribeiro<br>Consultoria em Projetos<br>blog: <a href="http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com">http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com</a><br>blog: <a href="http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com">
http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com</a><br>mail: <a href="mailto:carribeiro@gmail.com">carribeiro@gmail.com</a><br>mail: <a href="mailto:carribeiro@yahoo.com">carribeiro@yahoo.com</a><br><br>