nvidia-glx - glx invalid module format

[Daniel Stone]

On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:31:34PM +1200, Christoph Georgi wrote:
> Why does a old driver work, but a new one not?? I never understood that..

Sometimes people break code.

> If libglx.so is part of Xorg, is it then not a problem with xorg rather 
> then nvidia, esp as the nvidia-glx works great for most people?

No, since nVidia write libglx.so; it is part of their driver.

I meant that it was a module for Xorg rather than for the kernel.

> What's about the nvidia binaries from their homepage? Wouldn't compiling 
> a module out of that work?

It's the same thing as what's in the archive.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20050411/defcf64d/attachment.pgp