[ubuntu-art] panel icons
Sebastian Billaudelle
sebbil at gmx.de
Tue Jan 29 22:36:02 GMT 2008
Yes of course...
I'm working on a better version.
Tomorrow there'll be some better examples!
cheers stein
Am Dienstag, den 29.01.2008, 16:29 -0600 schrieb Andres Blanco:
> could u plz post a screenshot of your examples on different background
> colors?
>
> that would give us a better idea.
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 4:08 PM, Kenneth Wimer <kwwii at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 29 January 2008 21:33:57 Sebastian Billaudelle
> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I was playing arround a little bit, too:
> > I used the pallet from Union to get these icons (Like the
> one of Ken:
> > only a demonstation).
> > If anyone wants the sources, please contact me...
>
>
>
> My problem with these examples is that they would only look
> good on a limited
> amount of background colors. Not that I think that we need
> something to work
> on *every* background but it should be as flexible as possible
> within reason.
> I do like the idea of using rounded objects and a simple line
> though.
>
> Needs some work, perhaps someone can come up with something?
> --
> Ken
>
>
>
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 29.01.2008, 21:28 +0100 schrieb Kenneth
> Wimer:
> > > On Tuesday 29 January 2008 21:09:52 Dylan McCall wrote:
> > > > One quick concern from me: I see that the Update icon in
> this is going
> > > > back to the jagged orange splotch. I have yet to see how
> this
> > > > represents updating in any way, as it looks more like a
> bug report. The
> > > > icon that is currently in the Hardy alphas (with the
> downward-pointing
> > > > arrow) is quite a bit more informative.
> > >
> > > i agree, the little fleck of color was just to show how
> one could use
> > > color to denote there is some action to be taken (or
> currently being
> > > taken). Pretty much all of the ideas show there still need
> lots of work,
> > > I was just trying to get a feel for the general idea, not
> suggesting
> > > final icons.
> > >
> > > > As for which one I like, I prefer the not etched, simple
> 2d look. One
> > > > reason is just personal taste, the other reason is
> because panel icons
> > > > are usually like that. For example, if I go and download
> the latest
> > > > Pidgin that is built without Ubuntu in mind, I'll have
> the standard
> > > > colourful Pidgin icon. Alongside the etched icons it
> looks really
> > > > weird. With the flat 2d icons, it blends reasonably
> well. (Still not
> > > > perfectly, but better). I like that you use less colour
> for icons that
> > > > do not need urgent attention (that should "just work")
> like the volume
> > > > control and network info. That way, colour can be used
> for things to
> > > > stand out, and the colourful icons that other apps bring
> with them will
> > > > be less of a concern since they still fit fairly
> naturally with the
> > > > "official" design.
> > > > Ideally we shouldn't have to worry about this since
> applications like
> > > > Pidgin and Liferea should really not be putting
> themselves in the
> > > > notification area all the time, but it doesn't look like
> that will be
> > > > fixed very quickly.
> > >
> > > I expected more people to like the 2d versions compared to
> the etched
> > > versions, basically for the same reasons you just
> mentioned.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ken
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrés Blanco Morales
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20080129/5b8e8eba/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20080129/5b8e8eba/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-art
mailing list